After all conflict is logically the time of negotiations to finalize the various different. Negotiators have certainly primary mission of defending their own interests but also that of making compromises to move towards the desired peace. Accommodations that will confirm the mutual interest of parties to continue these negotiations to a better future for the region.
In the Middle East conflict, dating back several decades, the peace process initiated in 1993 has resulted in the fact that a return to square one and the probable future confrontations.
If the Israeli people through its various governments have accepted the idea of an exchange territories against peace, it is not the same with the Palestinian leadership''''inculcating in their people that peace must be nothing less than a capitulation of the Jewish people .
Thus, the current president of the Palestinian Authority , Mahmoud Abbas proclaims his desire to see the future independent state of Palestine'' ''purged of any Israeli presence. Beyond the spirit of the Charter of Rights allowing each live where he likes but according to local laws, the Jewish people should he withdraw from the land which was the birthplace of Judaism ? Is it possible, during a peace process, as nationals of either party are, from the outset banned from while the other belligerent demands the exact opposite for its hundreds of thousands of its citizens?
Is this the way to envisage a new beginning for the region?
The Israelis have also compromise the city of Jerusalem . About the city, mainly the Temple Mount since 1967 become the Esplanade of the Mosques and the third holiest site of Islam Israeli governments (though in opposition to the majority of their people) have proposed a partition. Muslim neighborhoods will be the''Palestine,''the Israeli Jewish neighborhoods. The Esplanade ''under Palestinian responsibility,''the Wailing Wall as that of Israel . As for the basement of the Temple Mount it will be managed jointly.
The response of the Palestinians''was''always negative. Their vice-minister of information Mutawakel Taha has until recently said that " according to Muslim tradition, the Wall is a Muslim holy site as part of the Esplanade of the Mosques and where the Prophet Muhammad tied his horse legendary Al Buraq ". "The Al-Buraq Wall is the western wall (the site) Al-Aqsa, whose occupation Zionist falsely claiming ownership (...). The wall was never part of the so-called Jewish temple .
We can do more directly for the Jewish people has no connection with this city!
Another requirement of the part''Palestinian''has demonstrated the lack of seriousness to be attached to his''commitment''to peace. The chief negotiators of the camp, Saeb Arekat , raised the issue of return of refugees '''' within the state of Israel . Of''refugees''to the number seven million, educated at the rancor and the certainty that the Jews are responsible for the fate that is theirs now. A demand which, if it were implemented, does much peace for Jews in their own homeland.
A summarize the above claims of the Palestinians'',''we see that:
a) the new state of''Palestine''will be purged of all Jewish presence.
b) the rights of Jewish people to the holy city are not recognized.
c) that the Jewish state must raise hundreds of thousands of''refugee''in lieu of the state to be born.
Given these findings, the question is simply what good bargain ?
0 comments:
Post a Comment