How Much Does A Mulberry Cost

BHL and its lights

Bernard Henry Levy is an intellectual whose quality One is to stick to the air it is politically correct. In view of the weekly Le Point titled "Honor Muslims " it gives the perfect measure. Thus, for him, the organization of international conference on Islamization of Europe , held in Paris December 18 last, was reduced to only two associations. One being the "neo-Nazi splinter group who had made famous, July 14, 2002, attempting to assassinate Jacques Chirac "- here the identity Bloc has decided to sue for libel because its existence began in April 2003 - the latter being only a" handful of former Trotskyites gathered under the banner of the website secular response!

gear when you know that 27 associations of different political make up the organization of this event. Focus attention on only these two opposing political associations with the colors indicating at least a willingness to harm and not understanding to enable an understanding of the thing.

But that is not the current topic.

In his view, BHL says he has "no thank you a war between, on one side, supporters of the updating of a faith which, like other monotheistic before she would decide to set the time of the rights issue and, on the other artisans that I am not mistaken, the first to have called fascislamism . He immediately adds, " that the former are often too timid or simply too few and that it is the latter, I mean the fanatics who hold almost everywhere, the high ground is clearly .

And that's where the shoe pinches the''Western''souchiens tired of seeing the expansion of Islam rigid and obscurantist in their countries. Annoyed to see that the authorities know what is bothering more and more a growing number of individuals. Exasperated to see the political parties make compromises with this religion with the aim to obtain the votes of believers in the elections. Upset to see the collective rights of democratic societies violated in the name of human rights requiring the performance of rites and customs of another age.

This separation of the sexes in common areas like swimming pools, the port in public places a veil or a hijab by Muslim women to avoid the sight and contact with fellow ;; halal food in canteens and rejecting the food choices of other citizens. Not to mention the appropriation of public space without permission of prayer times, and that to the dismay of residents, and construction of mosques often at the expense of the state and therefore taxpayers' money. To mention only the most visible requirements.

non-exhaustive list shows non compliance to the dominant culture and an attempt to alter by force and not by persuasion. Rape, in whatever way, also made by Muslims''moderates''in the name of their right to their religion and denounced by those Bernard Henry Levy quickly qualifies as "neo-Nazis " and "Trotskyites . What needs to smile a majority of the Swiss people that in two separate referenda scored his''intolerant''to the Islamization of his country!

There is little doubt the attentive reader of Western politics that public authorities have rejected any idea of legislating to force definitively the Islam to being a private matter. Not to endorse the requirement for the majority it is feared that this attitude leads people to make choices and violent reactions and the West to a catastrophic situation.

But all this, Henry Bernard Levy , the intellectual that he claims to be, does not see it.

*******************************************

This article been censored by the site Lepost.fr. See related article titled Requiem for site Lepost.fr .

Platelet Donation Risks

What good bargain? A Jerusalem

After all conflict is logically the time of negotiations to finalize the various different. Negotiators have certainly primary mission of defending their own interests but also that of making compromises to move towards the desired peace. Accommodations that will confirm the mutual interest of parties to continue these negotiations to a better future for the region.

In the Middle East conflict, dating back several decades, the peace process initiated in 1993 has resulted in the fact that a return to square one and the probable future confrontations.

If the Israeli people through its various governments have accepted the idea of an exchange territories against peace, it is not the same with the Palestinian leadership''''inculcating in their people that peace must be nothing less than a capitulation of the Jewish people .

Thus, the current president of the Palestinian Authority , Mahmoud Abbas proclaims his desire to see the future independent state of Palestine'' ''purged of any Israeli presence. Beyond the spirit of the Charter of Rights allowing each live where he likes but according to local laws, the Jewish people should he withdraw from the land which was the birthplace of Judaism ? Is it possible, during a peace process, as nationals of either party are, from the outset banned from while the other belligerent demands the exact opposite for its hundreds of thousands of its citizens?

Is this the way to envisage a new beginning for the region?

The Israelis have also compromise the city of Jerusalem . About the city, mainly the Temple Mount since 1967 become the Esplanade of the Mosques and the third holiest site of Islam Israeli governments (though in opposition to the majority of their people) have proposed a partition. Muslim neighborhoods will be the''Palestine,''the Israeli Jewish neighborhoods. The Esplanade ''under Palestinian responsibility,''the Wailing Wall as that of Israel . As for the basement of the Temple Mount it will be managed jointly.

The response of the Palestinians''was''always negative. Their vice-minister of information Mutawakel Taha has until recently said that " according to Muslim tradition, the Wall is a Muslim holy site as part of the Esplanade of the Mosques and where the Prophet Muhammad tied his horse legendary Al Buraq ". "The Al-Buraq Wall is the western wall (the site) Al-Aqsa, whose occupation Zionist falsely claiming ownership (...). The wall was never part of the so-called Jewish temple .

We can do more directly for the Jewish people has no connection with this city!

Another requirement of the part''Palestinian''has demonstrated the lack of seriousness to be attached to his''commitment''to peace. The chief negotiators of the camp, Saeb Arekat , raised the issue of return of refugees '''' within the state of Israel . Of''refugees''to the number seven million, educated at the rancor and the certainty that the Jews are responsible for the fate that is theirs now. A demand which, if it were implemented, does much peace for Jews in their own homeland.

A summarize the above claims of the Palestinians'',''we see that:

a) the new state of''Palestine''will be purged of all Jewish presence.

b) the rights of Jewish people to the holy city are not recognized.

c) that the Jewish state must raise hundreds of thousands of''refugee''in lieu of the state to be born.

Given these findings, the question is simply what good bargain ?

Przykładowe Reklamy Na Plafonach

Judenrein? Breaking the silence

Only fools and useful idiots still affirm the will of the Palestinian Authority negotiate to find the formula leads to the equation Two states for two peoples . In fact, after having worn the hat-stalled negotiations never started-by Israel, Palestinian leaders'',''supported by the Arab League , decided, " of expose the issue of Israeli settlement again before the Security Council and get a resolution stating, inter alia, the nature of this activity illegal (...) and forcing Israel to stop .

What's better, in fact, as making the legal refusal to see Israelis the nationality''Palestinian''?

The project will be put before the UN Council in February 2011. A resolution to certify the illegality of the "colonies " Israeli-located in the territories of Judea and conquered Samaria following the war of self defense in 1967 - but most will aim to declare by the band, the irregularity of the Jewish presence in what was the cradle of Judaism . A decision in the end, which will legalize the ethnic cleansing of the territory to become the second state of''Palestine''after one of Jordan.

Beyond " 1967 borders" is also East Jerusalem. The new resolution to appoint therefore also the inhabitants of this part of the city as " settlers" and their presence will be considered illegal. Worse! The Jewish inhabitants of the old city of King David , enshrined Solomon and rebuilt by Herod will show as illegal. Better! Jews worldwide pray that next year either Jerusalem will in the future it will remain forever futile as a prayer residents. At a pinch as tourists and the whim of future local potentate.

only remained for the Palestinian Authority then only require with the Council of international sanctions to force Israel to comply with this resolution and to demand a new decision recognizing this time, this judenrein territory as a state of Palestinian people''.'' Then remains only the problem of relocating the " seven million refugees" within of Israel to see a "just and equitable peace " settle in the region!

Given the current composition of the Security Council , it is difficult to believe that the draft resolution to come will be hard to make the breakthrough. Only one vote against a permanent member can prevent its adoption. The France and England being''country''Dhimmitude, it is difficult for Israel hope their veto. Like that of Russia , country listening to the Muslim world. Ditto for China perpetually in search of black gold, material owned largely by the same world.

Rest of the USA directed by Barak Hussein Obama . At last the U.S. administration has requested that this resolution is waived. Suggesting that the U.S. President not institutionalize anti-Semitism and will not do the Jewish people a people apart.